| |
Straw-to-Energy?
It Might Be Worth A Try
By
Ken D. Duft* |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Issue,
Action taken, Impact,
Project, Contact |
|
Printable
document in pdf format. |
|
| |
Summary
A
Washington State University study has found that crop residue produced
by Eastern Washington wheat, barley, and grass seed growers could
fuel the generation of about 400-425 megawatts of electricity annually;
more than that produced by any one of our current Snake River dams.
While energy production from straw is more expensive than hydro and
nuclear, blend pricing, environmental benefits, and the volatile electricity
market make it attractive. |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Issue
Eastern
Washington growers produce abundant crops of wheat, barley, and grass
seed. In doing so, they produce millions of tons of straw. Excess
crop residue can serve to reduce yields, propagate crop pests, and
pose an obstacle for planting the next crop. Disposal of excess crop
residue, especially in the highest yielding counties, is a problem.
Field burning, the historical and most economical solution, is no
longer a socially acceptable. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Over
the past decade, power demand in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho has
risen 24 percent while the region’s capacity to generate power has
increased by only four percent, according to the Northwest Power Planning
Council. Costs of buying energy when demand has exceeded supply have
skyrocketed for utilities. And as a result, ratepayers have seen
an escalation in electric bills. The energy crisis in California
exacerbated already short supplies in the Northwest. Depending on
the season, Washington and Oregon import and export power from California.
The 2001 draught left the Northwest with low levels of snow pack to
feed rivers and reservoirs for hydroelectric generation. |
|

Photo: Wheat
Stubble Burning Courtesy of Larry Schwarm used with his permission |
|
| |
The
technology for burning straw for power is not new. While no straw-burning
electrical generating facilities exist in the United States, several
European countries, including Denmark, the United Kingdom, and Spain,
do have large, efficient plants, burning 2 million tons of straw per
year.
 |
|
|
|
| |
What
Has Been Done
A
Washington State University study attempted to determine how much
straw is available, the total cost of getting straw from the field
to point of incineration; the most cost-effective methods of doing
that; the costs of building and operating a straw-power electrical
co-generating plant, and the break-even pricing of electrical power
produced. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Impact
The
study found that Eastern Washington grain growers produce about
3 million tons of straw that is economically feasible to harvest.
That much straw has the potential for producing 400-425 megawatts
of energy each year.
While
the cost of electrical production – about 8.5 cents per kwh. – would
be considerably higher than either hydro or nuclear sources, blend
pricing, environmental benefits and the volatile energy market still
make straw-to-energy worth considering. |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Blend
pricing refers to how electricity suppliers price their products.
Though power produced from straw may be uneconomical when priced at
the margin, blended with lower-cost sources, such as hydro and nuclear,
may make it economically feasible, especially when energy supplies
from lower-cost sources are limited and in short supply. The recent
volatility of the energy market may provide additional incentive. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Straw
is attractive as a fuel because it is renewable and considered to
be carbon dioxide neutral. CO2 released into the atmosphere
when burned for energy is offset by the amount of carbon dioxide
absorbed by the biomass source from the atmosphere when it is growing.
Researchers
concluded that cooperatives might provide the appropriate organizational
form of business needed to initiate this straw-to-energy conversion.
As such, those producing the straw would not only benefit from the
disposal of this by-product, but would stand to benefit from the
sale of the straw and the management/ownership of the resultant
off-farm enterprise. |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PROJECT
URL: http://www.agribusiness-mgmt.wsu.edu/AgbusResearch/Straw.htm |
|
| |
AREA
OF IMPACT:Extension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
FUNDING |
|
- Bonneville
Power Administration
- WA
State Council of Farmer Cooperatives
- Northwest
Cooperative Development Center
- State
of Washington
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LOCATION
OF IMPACT |
|
Adams
Asotin
Benton
Columbia
|
|
Douglas
Franklin
Garfield
Grant
|
|
Lincoln
Spokane
Walla Walla
Whitman |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CONTACT: |
|
Name: |
|
Kenneth
D. Duft |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Title: |
|
Cooperative
Extension Economist |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Institution: |
|
Washington
State University |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Phone: |
|
(509)
335-2972 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Fax: |
|
(509)
335-1173 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
E-mail: |
|
duftk@wsu.edu |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
URL: |
|
http://www.ses.wsu.edu/People/Duft.htm |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
*Ken
Duft is an Extension Economist at Washington State University |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |